Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/httpd/vhosts/artworldsalon.com/httpdocs/blog/wp-includes/cache.php on line 99

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/httpd/vhosts/artworldsalon.com/httpdocs/blog/wp-includes/query.php on line 21

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/httpd/vhosts/artworldsalon.com/httpdocs/blog/wp-includes/theme.php on line 576
Artworld Salon » Blog Archive » The Appeal of SEVEN
Artworld Salon

Opinion Analysis Debate

The Appeal of SEVEN

Wednesday November 24, 2010 | 17:17 by Edward Winkleman | permalink

sevenBack in 2006, in an article titled “A storm of art as Baselmania engulfs Miami,” New York Times art critic Roberta Smith predicted that

Art fairs will continue to flourish until the bottom falls out of the art market, or until dealers, who invented them, decide that there is a better way to do things.

The global recession never quite saw the bottom fall out of the art market, but it has arguably spawned a number of dealer-invented alternatives to the more traditional art fair model, such as Independent in New York, Sunday in London, and ABC in Berlin. But back in 2006, Smith highlighted one pioneering effort as an indication of what she thought the future held:

Two dealers already on this quest are Ronald Feldman, a longtime SoHo gallerist, and Joe Amrhein of Pierogi, a Williamsburg fixture. They have rented a raw one-story building in the Wynwood district here and filled its 12,000 square feet with works by artists they represent.

Fast forward to 2010, and the model Pierogi and Feldman built has evolved into a venture that now includes seven contemporary art galleries, including London’s Hales Gallery, who began participating in 2007, and New York’s BravinLee programs, Postmasters, P•P•O•W, and (my own gallery) Winkleman, who all join for the first time this year. The focus of this expanded effort, called simply SEVEN, is in creating an exhibition experience within the context of Miami’s art fair week defined by the needs of each artist’s work. The press release on the event’s website explains this idea in more depth. What the press release doesn’t explain is how each decision about SEVEN (whether on marketing, installation placements, shipping costs, etc.) is agreed to by us, the participating dealers, and that the costs are so significantly less than participating in one of the larger fairs that the 24,000 square foot space we’ll be sharing this year offers an opportunity to present work in Miami that would be cost-prohibitive, if possible at all, at the big box fairs. Because each of the participating galleries’ programs include presenting large-scale installations, for the first time we new participants have the chance to bring such work to Miami and better reflect what we’re about to that audience.

Another appeal of SEVEN’s model is something that requires a bit of clarification about the art dealer’s point of view to explain fully. Anyone who has the independence, ambition, and ego it requires to open a commercial art gallery (or the stamina to have kept it afloat over the past two years) will undoubtedly not love all the rules and restrictions that larger fairs require of participants. Of course, from a fair organizer’s point of view, it is understandable with an operation as complex as they have, with products as expensive as fine art, and with visitor expectations as high as they are among the world’s top collectors, that they cannot cater to each dealer’s whims or risk protracted, time-consuming debates by explaining each decision to egomaniacal dealers who refuse to take “No” for an answer. Guidelines and restrictions are necessary to keep the whole thing smoothly moving along. But from my point of view, coming as I do from my little kingdom in which it’s the vision of the artist first and foremost that dictates how we present the artwork, and not a 10-page contract, SEVEN is a vastly superior option in this regard.

What SEVEN doesn’t have, of course, is the collective audience draw of hundreds of the world’s best-known galleries, or their advertising budgets, or their VIP lounge sponsors. But we’re OK with that. None of those things truly make the viewing experience better. In fact, they can greatly hinder it. Which isn’t to say I don’t enjoy the bigger fairs. I find them oddly comforting (so much attention being paid to what begins as humble materials and efforts in some studio). But it is exhilarating to be able to dream big with your artists within the Miami context and not have to sell a body part to pay for it.

It’s also truly refreshing to strategize and discuss the plans and logistics of the event with other dealers who completely understand and empathize with my concerns, and aspirations, for the week. An art fair experience designed by dealers with their artists’ visions dictating the choices…I suspect the idea will quickly catch on.

E-Mail This Post/Page del.icio.us:The Appeal of SEVEN digg:The Appeal of SEVEN Y!:The Appeal of SEVEN

2 Responses

  1. 1. Ian Charles Stewart Says:

    Nice to see some entrepreneurial spirit in the ArtWorld, Ed. And the tradition of offshoot venues around the larger fairs is long established. I look forward to seeing if you and your colleagues have been brave enough, though.

    The fun of the big fair venues for me is to overwhelm the senses and look for trends and shifts overall. This is in addition to appreciating the opportunity to discover new artists from galleries I would never take the time to visit on foot in their own environment.

    But to visit a satellite venue I need a reason. The satellite venue musn’t simply try to duplicate the large on a smaller scale as there would then be no point in visiting. The draw could be one highly marketable artist (the way Hirst drew people to his seminal single artist Sotheby’s sale in 2008), or a new approach to displays, or simply a fantastic collection of small hand picked galleries? Presumably you guys are a combination of the latter two? %-)

    Zoo achieved it in London around Frieze, at least in the early days. By focusing on less expensive works by lesser known artists. At a time of great artwork price inflation that worked well. I look forward to hearing how you guys do and what market reaction you get.


  2. 2. András Szántó Says:

    What I find most encouraging about Seven is not the entrepreneurialism, but the cooperation.

    Looking back on the crash of 08, what is so astonishing is how few efforts were made, even in the face of crisis, to team up and share space, staff, advertising, and capital. Dealers, it seems, would sooner go out of business than throw in their lot with each other.

    Why isn’t the Seven model prevalent in the routine operations of the art world? Many obvious and reasonable answers can be given to that question. Yet the atomized sprawl of the gallery system cries out for such partnerships, which are typical in other creative sectors. Cooperation could aggregate and rationalize resources, making the whole effort more sustainable, especially for small galleries.

    I would like to see more Sevens, and Nines, and Fives, and Elevens in the gallery scene, year round. We would all be the better for it.


Leave a Comment

If you have a username, you can login to post a comment. Please read the Comments Policy page for details.

SEARCH:


  •   
  • RECENT COMMENTS:

    SUBSCRIPTION FEEDS:

    Add to Technorati Favorites