Sharjah Biennial: Less Oil More Courage
With the announcement of Abu Dhabi’s multi-billion-dollar cultural tourism plans and last month’s DIFC Gulf Art Fair in Dubai hogging the limelight, it was easy to overlook neighboring Sharjah’s more modest cultural efforts, with the Sharjah Biennial — its eighth installment opened last week — as the centrepiece. In contrast to DIFC governor Dr Omar Bin Sulaiman’s frank admission (at the Dubai fair’s opening) of having no knowledge of art, Sharjah’s Biennial is headed by Sheikha Hoor al-Qasimi, daughter of Sharjah’s ruler, who holds degrees in fine art and curating from London’s Slade School and the Royal College of Art. While the day-to-day artistic direction was in the hands of Jack Persekian, the peripatetic Palestinian curator, the Sheikha herself reportedly chose the theme of the Biennial — Still Life: Art, Ecology and the Politics of Change. A BIG, and on the face of it, highly controversial theme to tackle in the United Arab Emirates, where a reported 30 percent of the construction world’s cranes currently reside.
Driving around Sharjah, the text (Less Oil More Courage) - from Rikrit Tiravanija’s small painted contribution to the biennial - screams at you from numerous roadside signs. The tiny painting itself has been hung on the wall facing you as you enter the Sharjah Art Museum, above a formal portrait of the Sheikh. The incongruity of this stark message serving as the biennial’s main publicity poster perhaps best embodies Sharjah’s own cultural positioning in the UAE’s nascent but fast-emerging art world. As Abu Dhabi uses economic-impact assessments drawn up by management consultants to plan a cultural island as tourist destination, and Dubai extends its ambition of being a clearinghouse to the artworld, Sharjah is attempting to create an infrastructure for artistic production and exchange. The reported biennial budget of $3 million enabled over 50 projects to be specially commissioned.
In this role of regional champion, Sharjah is an interesting example to examine the evolutionary path of the biennial phenomenon. Venice is perhaps the exemplar of the “biennial as prize distribution/artworld validation” — a fine-arts version of the Oscars, with a similar impact on box office. At the other end of the spectrum lies the “biennial as art infrastructure.” Sharjah, to my mind, is part of this group. (Others would include the Liverpool Biennial’s efforts to regenerate the city, and Brisbane’s using the Asia Pacific Triennial as a way to build an institution with a world-class collection in Asian art.) Most other biennials lie somewhere in between - initiated by governments seeking to meet their own diplomatic, branding or tourist aims (think Singapore) or by local artworld folks wanting one of their own (too many to mention). In that way, biennials are the new airlines: Every country thinks they need one, but very few have a distinctive enough offering to bring to the world.
Having slotted Sharjah into the biennial-as-infrastructure category, the question that remains unanswered is: “Infrastructure for whom?” Ten days was more than enough to notice that the Biennial had skirted around the uniqueness of the UAE’s (and Sharjah’s) social structure. The majority of its population is expatriate - an astounding 78 percent. And a large percentage of this is composed of male immigrant labour from the Asian subcontinent, living with limited rights and virtually no voice. In fact, most of the technical teams in the Museum, and the labourers in the Sharjah Expo Centre, where larger-scale installations are housed, came from the North West Frontier Province in Pakistan. But this element of Sharjah’s and the UAE’s ecology remained largely untouched by the Biennial itself, or its participating artists. The two notable exceptions were Dan Perjovschi’s finely weighted cartoons, and a collaborative project between e-Xplo (Erin McGonigle, Heimo Lattner, and Rene Gabri) and Ayreen Anastas in the form of public sound installations (also produced as a CD) of migrant workers singing or reciting poetry in their mother tongues.
Neither the demographics of the UAE, nor the emerging centres of art production/consumption seem to have had much influence in the choice of artists invited to the Biennial. Of the more than 80 artists present, just one (Ranjani Shettar) came from the subcontinent, and precisely zero from China. And while I would hate to argue for a UN model for international art events, I was disappointed to see that Sharjah’s version of “international” seemed to look mostly westwards. As the UAE’s ambitions for being the centre of the art world grow, future biennials, art fairs and collections would do well to start experimenting with different ways of looking.





I really loved the comparison between airlines and biennials, very funny!
It is indeed a tricky decision for the curators of any international event to make sure you create the perfect “blend” of artists. What is the right percentage of female artists v/s male artists, queer artists etc…? If you only invite young and upcoming artists that no one has heard of, you will get less media attention. And if you put in too many of the regular “biennial-artists” you will get bad media coverage. The list goes on.
I think what is much sought for in the region as a whole is international/western attention and approval about what they are doing so that it can become, in the long run, a hub for the local art scene to grow and get appreciation from the outside. Only then can a more fruitful exchange happen. Maybe this can be at least one reason for a western outlook?
Full disclosure: we represent two of the artists participating in Sharjah this year (they’re from Kyrgyzstan [which is definitely not the West]), so I’m not ambivalent about its success, but looking at your list of biennials that are more risky (as compared to those more commercially aware), the one thing they seem to have in common is relative economic hardship (Liverpool and Sharjah [which I understand is much poorer than the states around it] being the most obvious examples). Making me wonder whether the old adage is true: art becomes more interesting when times are tougher.
It’s a bit of a stretch in this context, I realize, but I’m curious about whether you think the Sharjah Biennial can afford to take more risks because it has not as much to lose?
Absolutely. In a way that is what I was alluding to with “Less Oil More Courage” as Sharjah’s unofficial motto.
It would be unfair to Sharjah to suggest this is a premeditated strategy (the ruling family’s interest and engagement is obvious — the Sheikh has a WEEKLY meeting with the Head of Museums), but they have the space to play. I am not sure Venice can do ‘play’ anymore.
Not to argue with Ed’s basic point, which is in the classic “strong markets, bad art” vein, but I think we should keep in mind that Sharjah is only comparatively disadvantaged. As Hammad noted, the Sharjah Biennial commissioned over 50 projects, which I’m guessing is at least as many as Rob Storr was able to in Venice. (I could be wrong about that this year, but as a rule the major biennials - Berlin, Venice, Sao Paulo, Istanbul - tend to be underfunded and are often therefore quite dependent on dealer/patron support when it comes to commissioning many new projects.)
To get back the role of regional biennials, I think Hammad’s airlines metaphor is an apt one. And in the long run, that suggests, many biennials will not survive, for much the same reason that we no longer have Sabena airlines in Belgium and that my homeland’s once majestic SwissAir is now owned by Germany’s Lufthansa: The numbers just don’t add up, not when so many entities offer roughly the same product to a relatively limited market.
To me, that means that those leading regional biennials should focus on using the events to built up a local infrastructure - develop an audience, exhibition spaces, residencies for foreign artists - which can sustain itself long past the moment when the international art scene has turned its fickle eyes elsewhere. Because, as Power noted, bringing in the same tired “biennial artists” for another star turn is just a boring waste of money. Better to do something with a truly local touch.